Login  /  Register  | 3 premium articles left before you must register.

Cover songs: Homage or marketing ploy?

RYAN NAKASHIMA, AP Business Writer

Publication: The Day

Published June 01. 2013 4:00AM
Chris Pizzello/Invision/AP photo
Adele performs the frequently covered "Skyfall" during the 2013 Oscars ceremony.

There are about 600 versions of Adele's Oscar-winning song "Skyfall" on the Spotify subscription music service. Not one of them features Adele.

Adele's label, XL Recordings, keeps her music off of all-you-can-listen subscription plans until download sales peter out. In the meantime, copycat artists fill the void, racking up royalty revenue.

Alice Bonde Nissen found that out the hard way. She once paid 99 Krone ($17) a month for Spotify's premium service in Denmark. Bonde found a version of "Skyfall" and mistakenly clicked on a "follow" button to become a fan of GMPresents and Jocelyn Scofield, the name for a cover-song specialist with some 4,600 Spotify followers. Scofield, who didn't respond to a message seeking comment for this story, has Spotify's most listened-to cover of "Skyfall."

"When I found out ... that I couldn't find the original 'Skyfall' (and some other hits) I decided to quit Spotify," Nissen says.

Thousands of cover songs crowd digital music services such as Spotify and Rhapsody and the phenomenon threatens the growth of these services - which have millions of paying subscribers - and could hold back the tepid recovery of the music industry.

Streaming services put a world of music at listeners' fingertips. For a flat fee - usually about $10 a month in the U.S. - users can listen to as many songs as they wish. The music resides on the provider's servers and gets transmitted, or streamed, to subscribers as they listen on smartphones, tablet computers and PCs. The services allow users to store songs on their devices as long as they keep paying. But because such a vast selection can be stored online, when listeners search for popular songs, they often find oddball renditions.

Cover songs are perfectly legal in the U.S. and have a long tradition in the music industry. Some covers are even more famous than the originals. Which do you think of first, Aretha Franklin's soaring 1967 version of "Respect," or Otis Redding's original from two years earlier? How about Jimi Hendrix's funky 1968 rendition of "All Along the Watchtower"? Does anyone even remember that Bob Dylan wrote and released it six months before?

The difference today is that anyone with a computer, a microphone and an Internet connection can create and distribute a cover. New technology, from affordable digital recording equipment and sound-mixing programs to convenient online services are making homemade covers an easy and profitable endeavor.

Spotify's head of development and analysis, Sachin Doshi, acknowledges that locating covers instead of originals can be frustrating. "We recognize it's a problem we haven't fully solved yet," Doshi says.

Jon Maples, Rhapsody's vice president of product management, says customers have asked that cover songs be removed and the company has targeted 10,000 for deletion. "It just clutters the experience," he says.

Some independent artists insist cover songs are a fast way to achieve fame. Kina Grannis says covers are helping her build a fan base. The 27-year-old Los Angeles-based singer won the 2008 Doritos' Crash the Super Bowl contest. As part of the competition, fans were asked to vote for an aspiring musician's music video. The winner got to air their creation before 100 million viewers on game day. Grannis says she wouldn't have earned enough votes to win if she hadn't seeded her YouTube channel every day with covers of artists like Jason Mraz and Death Cab for Cutie. Many of her current followers on YouTube stumbled upon her while searching for originals.

"It doesn't feel bad that they were looking for someone else, because they didn't even know I existed," says Grannis, whose original song video "In Your Arms," has racked up 9.2 million views.

U.S. copyright law says cover artists don't require the original artist's permission, as long as they get a license, pay royalties and let the original songwriters release their version first. Streaming services like Spotify are obligated by law to handle songwriting royalties on behalf of cover artists.

Services like Google Inc.'s Limelight, which launched in late 2009, offer commercial song licenses to anyone who fills out a form. The hurdle is so low for amateurs that once a hit song comes out, it's covered quickly. Take "Suit & Tie," a Justin Timberlake song released by RCA in January. There are already around 180 covers on Spotify.

Since Adele's "Skyfall" was released in October, it has sold more than 1.9 million copies in the U.S. Cover artists sold more than 54,000 copies, according to Nielsen. The top-selling cover was produced by Movie Sounds Unlimited, a subsidiary of music publisher BMG, and sold over 9,800 units.

While some people make covers to get discovered, others seem to be in it to trick buyers and make a fast buck. A recent search for popular artists on Spotify reveals plenty of me-too bands who pick deceptive artist names like the "Bruno Mars Tributors" or song names like "Firework (As Made Famous By Katy Perry)." The artwork and graphics used for their songs are sometimes a mirror image of the originals.

The producer behind that Katy Perry cover says he's not out to deceive.

"It's not about trying to live in somebody's shadow or faking people out," says Michael Vail Blum, the owner of Titan Music Inc. Blum says the cover song business is about taking great material and making a great recording.

But sounding similar is often the whole point, explains a person familiar with how the industry works. The executive spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to speak publicly about it. The sound-alike can take the place of the original for businesses like malls and restaurants that want to use the song but can't afford the original.

When iTunes launched in 2001, bands like The Beatles, AC/DC, Metallica and Kid Rock refused to sell their music online, so cover artists swooped in to profit from the digital demand. Standing in the place of originals in search results, sound-alike songs made hundreds of thousands dollars when consumers bought their songs.

That's not illegal, says Chris Mooney, senior director of artist promotions at indie song distributor TuneCore.

"A cover song does not have to be an entirely original take on a version," he says.

Brian Felsen, the president of CDBaby, says that while a gray area exists today, the deluge of covers can't really be stopped.

"Everybody polices it as much as you can," he says, adding that his staff attempts to prevent "blatant" knock-offs that copy cover art and use other deceptive practices from being distributed. But he acknowledges that having so many covers isn't good for consumers. "It may not be illegal or immoral, but it may not be the best thing for society at large either."

News by Town

Most Recent Poll
Are you surprised to learn that moms are the top earners in four of 10 U.S. homes?
This study is an indication of why families and marriages are on the decline.
24%
Nothing new here. I'm among the 40% who are the primary breadwinners.
15%
Finally. This is recognition of women's importance in the workplace.
16%
This study shows that gender is irrelevant. Women can be the breadwinner. Men can be the stay-at-home parent.
46%
Number of votes: 810

No current items found