Login  /  Register  | 3 premium articles left before you must register.

Documents released by police contained Social Security info

By Greg Smith

Publication: The Day

Published 07/24/2013 12:00 AM
Updated 07/23/2013 11:42 PM
NL administration apologizes; The Day removes document from its website

New London - The city has apologized for inadvertently including Social Security numbers on police reports provided to The Day under a Freedom of Information request.

The information was posted online at theday.com with a column by David Collins on Friday about the police department's canine program. The documents were removed from the website when editors became aware that the Social Security information was included, said Timothy Dwyer, The Day's executive editor.

Zak Leavy, executive assistant to the mayor, said standard procedure is to redact Social Security numbers when documents are made public.

"This was just an error by secretarial staff at the police department when they were compiling the information. This is just an oversight," Leavy said. "The city apologizes for this unintentional error."

Collins had requested five years of police reports pertaining to incidents involving dog bites by police dogs and copies of the complaints involving police dogs. Several Social Security numbers were included in the police reports.

Dwyer said it is The Day's policy not to publish personal information such as Social Security numbers.

"In response to a Freedom of Information request, the city inadvertently provided us with documents that contained Social Security numbers for some individuals. Once we realized the documents contained this personal information, the documents were removed from theday.com," Dwyer said.

"The Day's policy is to not edit documents released to us under a Freedom of Information request, so we filed a second Freedom of Information request this week. The request is pending," Dwyer said.

Thomas A. Hennick, the state Freedom of Information Commission's public education officer, said the commission historically orders the redaction of Social Security numbers on a document that would otherwise be released under state law. It does not order release of Social Security numbers.

g.smith@theday.com

Town News

Visit Zip06
Submit Your:  Submit Your News Submit Your Photos Submit Your Events
Most Recent Poll
Now that it's a boy, what do you think the Royal Baby born Monday to Prince William and Kate Middleton should be named?
George
12%
Alexander
19%
Charles
2%
Henry
4%
Ringo
5%
Who cares?
58%
Number of votes: 1013

No current items found